考核评估内审流程

ufc押注网站SQA HND项目中心建立了内审员制度和相应的内审组织，明确了内审员职责，这里需要明确课业评估内审流程，确保课业评估的公平、一致和有效。

1.前一学期末，确定课程的考核员和内审员，内审人员的组成应包含考核员和内审员。

2.学期初召开内审组会议，研读相关课程的AE。

3.内审员取得考核员的授课计划，编制相关课程内审时间安排表。

4. 如果是考核员参考AE自行设计课业评估方法和作业，则在学期初内审组会议上进行专题研讨，并通过内审，将形成的课业题目在准备使用前3个月上报SQA进行预审。

5.员工完成课业后，由考核员评估课业，依据Assessment号码顺序整理班级课业，以便内审员进行课业审核。

6.考核员要采取措施来鉴定Assessment是由该员工提供的，进行鉴定的方法包括：提问、使用个人日志、员工的陈述、同学的报告、人证、在监督下进行详细描述、机器检测和员工、任课教师、考核员的连署签名等等。

7.所有内审员对所有课程的内审样本，均进行60%抽样。可采用简单随机抽样方法，公平获得60%的员工课业。

8.内审员在一周内依据QA标准对员工的考核课业进行审查，实际是对抽样的员工课业进行重新评估，依据评估结果填制内审表。

9.如果内审员评估后给出的成绩等级与考核员一致，考核员评分将视为公正有效。

10.如果内审员评估后给出的成绩等级与考核员不一致，内审员与考核员进行协商，协商一致则依据协商结果对该班级课业进行重新评定，并填写内审工作记录。

11.如果内审员与考核员协商不一致，提交内审组确定。以确定的意见对该班级课业进行重新评定，并填写内审会议记录。

12.内审员对重新评定的成绩，依据上述流程进行再次内审，填写内审表。

13. 内审结果应及时反馈给考核员以进一步完善课业考核。

14.考核员和内审员均有权利对于上述过程和结果保留个人的意见，认为必要时也可以启动教师申诉程序。

         15.对于课业评估内审流程应该有一个年度的修改和版本的更新。

Internal Verification Procedure on Assessment

SQA HND Programme centre of FJXU in the School of International Education has established internal verification system and corresponding internal verification organization in place, which clarify and definite the duties of internal verifiers. A clear internal verification procedure on unit assessment guarantees the fairness, consistency and validity of unit assessment.

1. At the end of each semester, confirm assessors and internal verifiers for the following semester. Assessors and internal verifiers will involve in the internal verification.

2. Hold internal verifier group meeting at the beginning of each semester, studying AE relevant to each unit.

3. The internal verifier acquires the delivery plan from the assessor, designing the Time Schedule Table of Internal Verification.

4. Alternative assessment tasks, suggested solutions and marking scheme, made by assessors referring to AE, need special verifying and discussing in internal verifier group meeting which is held at the beginning of each semester. And then the alternative assessment material should be send it to SQA at least 3 months before use it.

5. The candidates’ evidence is marked by assessor, which should be arranged in order with assessment code so that internal verifiers could verify them in an easier way.

6. Assessors need to take steps to authenticate that candidates’ evidence was produced by candidates themselves. There are several ways of carrying out authentication. Authentication can be achieved by one or more of these methods:  such as questioning, use of personal logs, personal statements, peer reports, witness testimony, write-ups under supervised conditions, electronic tools, countersigning of work by candidates, and/or by lecturer/assessor, etc.

7. All the internal verifiers sample on candidates’ evidence in all units at 60% rate at random to fairly obtain 60% candidates’ evidence.

8. The internal verifiers verify the sampling candidates’ evidence according to the QA criteria within one week, which actually is regarded as reevaluation, and fill in internal verification form based on assessment decisions.

9. The achievement results marked by assessor in accord with that of internal verifiers could be granted fairness and validity.

10. The achievement results marked by assessor disaccording with that of internal verifiers, it is imperative to make a consultation between internal verifiers and assessors, and then the candidates’ evidence in one class need reevaluating according to the consistent consultation results. Internal verifier is responsible for keeping internal verification record.

11. If the internal verifiers and assessor can not reach an agreement, the internal verifier group interferes in the consultation for a decision. The candidates’ evidence in that class need reevaluating according to the determined consultation results. Internal verifier is responsible for keeping internal verifier group meeting record.

12. The achievement results reevaluated by internal verifiers shall go through the process of internal verification again according to the previous procedure. Internal verifier is responsible for completing internal verification form.

13. The outcome of internal verification should be given as feedback to the assessors and used to refine assessment.

14. Both the assessors and internal verifiers have the right to preserve their personal opinion of the procedure and results mentioned above, may also resort to the Teachers’ Appeals Procedure if necessary.